
Give Your Optimizely Devs (and Agents) Visual Guardrails to Prevent Bugs. Save your spot for the Oct. 29th webinar
For many QA teams, automation presents a challenge: how do you scale efficiently when team members have different levels of coding expertise?
Eric Terry, Senior Director of Quality Control at EVERSANA INTOUCH, shared how his team successfully adopted a hybrid automation approach—leveraging both coded and no-code automation to bridge skill gaps, improve test efficiency, and enhance collaboration.
For teams considering Applitools Autonomous, Eric’s journey offers a real-world example of how AI-powered, no-code automation can accelerate testing while making automation accessible to a broader team.
QA teams often include a mix of experienced developers and manual testers with limited coding experience. This gap can create inefficiencies and limit test coverage.
Common challenges QA managers face:
Inconsistent automation practices lead to knowledge silos and increased maintenance overhead.
Eric’s team adopted a hybrid strategy that leverages both coded and no-code automation tools, ensuring that:
Eric’s team reduced test maintenance by 40% by integrating AI-driven no-code automation while keeping developers focused on high-value coding tasks.
One of the biggest breakthroughs for Eric’s team was prioritizing Autonomous-first testing for repetitive and UI-driven test cases. This led to:
Key benefits of AI-powered no-code tools:
Want to see how Applitools Autonomous can help your team bridge your skill gaps to scale test automation? Try a free trial today.
For QA teams considering Applitools Autonomous, Eric’s experience provides a clear roadmap for success in scaling coded and no-code automation to boost test efficiency. His key recommendations include:
Learn more by watching Code or No-Code Tests? Why Top Teams Choose Both
No-code automation allows non-developers—like manual testers or business users—to create and run automated tests. This expands the pool of contributors to QA efforts, enabling faster coverage without hiring additional engineering resources.
Yes. Tools like Applitools Autonomous use AI to adapt tests to UI changes, significantly lowering the time spent on script maintenance while preserving accuracy and reliability.
A hybrid approach lets teams use no-code automation for fast, repeatable tests while reserving coded automation for complex scenarios. This combination enables faster test execution, better resource allocation, and more scalable testing strategies.
Use no-code automation for repetitive, UI-driven workflows that require quick setup and minimal technical oversight. Reserve coded automation for complex logic, API testing, and highly customized scenarios that no-code tools may not support well.
Demonstrate quick wins—like reduced maintenance and faster release cycles—from pilot projects. Highlight how no-code solutions scale QA efforts without adding headcount, and show how they complement, not replace, existing engineering investments.